My husband and I were just put up against the wall recently
with a fully loaded rule book pointed straight at us, and told we needed to
abide to said rules or suffer the consequences. Fortunately, Brad has just as
much of a rebellious spirit as I do, and we both decided to graciously walk
away from the confines that were being laid out before us. Viva la liberte! The situation made me think of so many artists that have been considered defiant because they didn’t “play along nicely”, or theydid play along nicely,
just not the way others wanted them to play. Freaks, rebels, weirdoes, devils
in disguise….call them what you will, they changed the course of history
because of their willingness to go beyond the expectations and break the norms.
Portrait of Marcel Duchamp |
Some of you might be absolutely outraged to think that
Duchamp would even consider that to be art. Some of you might think he was
being facetious. Some of you may think he was brilliant. I am hoping you think
the latter and this is why. The people on the committee had a confined (may I
even be bold enough to use the phrase “close-minded”?) perspective of what art
is, and were forced into a position of thinking and perhaps re-defining what
should be considered when art becomes Art. Duchamp simply felt that the urinal
had beauty in its form. When not placed in its typical setting, it purely
became an object to be appreciated and stripped of its labels. He also argued
that just because he didn’t actually make the urinal, does not mean that it’s
not art. The placement of the object created new thought, and THAT is what
makes it art.
Right now you might be thinking, WHO ON EARTH WOULD CONSIDER
A URINAL TO BE BEAUTIFUL?! Who said art had to be beautiful? I have seen enough
funny looking babies in my lifetime to know that beauty is in the eye of the
beholder. Who said art has to hang up over your couch? Who said that art has to
be “nice” and play by the rules? I always tell my students, you need to know
the rules before you can break them. It’s my way of ensuring that they know the
foundation of the Arts, and how there is structure and there is beauty in this
fantastic world, but that if you just stick with those rules, then you might as
well be doing colour by number paintings, because there is no thought going
into your work. It is important to push those ideas, even when the status quo
may think it’s being a bit too rebellious and shaking their pretty, happy
norms.
Picasso hid “Les Mademoiselle D’Avignon” for decades because
fellow artists felt he was making a mockery of Modern Art. Cubism became a
household name once revealed.
Monet’s first Impressionist painting,
“Sunrise”, was described as looking like
it was scribbled with crayons by a child that was drawing on a moving train.
Dali was
considered to be crooked instead of brilliant when he signed blank pieces of
paper before his art work was printed on them (I know I’d much rather have an
original signature over a printed one, and they sell for so much more). Banksy
is considered a vandal as he spray paints poignant statements on walls around
the world.
And what about Mr. R.
Mutt aka Marcel Duchamp? He became the father of “ready-made” art, otherwise
known as Found Object Art. He took found objects and transformed them into
other things to be used and/or appreciated. Sound familiar? Ever hear of
someone turning a pallet into a table, or jewellery being made out of old
computer circuit boards? Google “found object art” and when you are looking at
all of the beautiful things that are made out of reclaimed materials today, think
of Duchamp and his willingness to rebel against the rules to bring concepts
like this to you. This art piece is considered one of the most influential
pieces of modern art in existence.
Marcel Duchamp
“Fountain”
Glazed ceramic
1917
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
This article was first published in the Northern Sun News, without the pictures because there's never enough room because I always go over my 500 word limit. I can't help it.
No comments:
Post a Comment